Claudia Hoffman

|
ISCONCEPTION
1: A patient with irreversible pulpitis has a painful response to hot and
cold.
Irreversible pulpitis is often characterized by a
painful, lingering response to cold. Irreversible pulpitis can be acute,
subacute, or chronic; therefore, it can be partially or totally infected.
The degree of inflammation in the pulp of a tooth with irreversible pulpitis
is so diseased that root canal therapy is the treatment of choice. The
signs and symptoms can vary, based on the extent and inflammation in the
pulp; usually the patient feels spontaneous, intermittent, or continuous
pain. The pain may be brought on by sudden temperature changes (usually
cold), and elicit prolonged episodes of pain. This pain may be relieved
by the application of heat or cold. Reversible pulpitis does not involve
spontaneous pain; therefore, it is reactive only when stimulated, and the
response does not linger after stimulus is removed.
Radiographs are not diagnostic in irreversible pulpitis
because the inflammation is confined to the pulp. The radiographs can help
with finding the etiology of the disease, such as deep caries or restorations.
In late stages of irreversible pulpitis there may be a thickened PDL evident
on the radiograph.
The EPT is not diagnostic in symptomatic cases of
irreversible pulpitis because the pulp is inflamed and still responds to
electrical stimulus.
Irreversible pulpitis is the most likely to have
referred pain.
MISCONCEPTION 2: When there is no area of rarefaction on the radiograph
the teeth are OK.
Areas of rarefaction are evident on a radiograph
only when the destruction has eroded the cortical plate. Therefore, a tooth
can be nonvital and have bone destruction around the apices but not be
evident from radiographic examination.
This becomes evident when you obturate a nonvital
tooth and there is a significant cement puff on the final film. This is
a tooth that had apical bone destruction with no intact PDL, but the condition
did not appear on the radiograph because the bone destruction had not broken
through the cortical plate.
MISCONCEPTION 3: Leaving a tooth open is a good option if the tooth
has drained and the patient is in pain.
It is common to open an infected tooth and have purulent
drainage. In most cases, after cleaning and shaping the canals the drainage
will stop. The tooth should be allowed to drain under the rubber dam for
up to 20 minutes. If the drainage stops, closing the tooth after treatment
is the best procedure, because teeth left open are often involved in mid-treatment
flare-ups (Seltzer, 1997).
In rare occasions when the tooth will not stop draining,
a patient can be placed on antibiotics and a sponge or cotton pellet should
be placed in the access. The tooth should be closed the next day. Teeth
that are left open show higher levels of secretory IgA than teeth not left
open, and this can lead to an increase in periapical cyst formation (Torres,
1994).
The possibility of mid-treatment flare-ups and cyst
formation illustrate the desirability of closing all teeth under the rubber
dam after treatment whenever possible.
MISCONCEPTION 4: A patient who has a fistulous tract should be placed
on antibiotics.
If a patient presents with a fistula, the first step
is to trace the fistula and obtain a radiograph. After correct diagnosis
is confirmed, and root canal therapy is initiated, when possible the tooth
should be cleaned and shaped and packed with calcium hydroxide. The patient
should be rescheduled for evaluation and completion of treatment in approximately
ten days. It is best not to give the patient antibiotics after the first
visit because as practitioners we would like to see the fistula resolve
through the removal of the etiology of bacteria. If the fistula resolves
with no antibiotic coverage, we know we have successfully removed the etiology
of the infection. Antibiotic coverage can cause the fistula to disappear
although the bacteria in the canal have not been removed, and can give
a false sense of healing.
November-December 2005
|
It is important to continually disinfect
the surface of your finger ruler. Placing an instrument from an infected
canal on the surface to check or change the measurement control can lead
to cross-contamination of new instruments and gutta-percha cones.
Doug Kase |
|
|